Showing posts with label hancher auditorium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hancher auditorium. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Our View - UI chooses the split-baby option for HVC complex

Printed in the Iowa City Press-Citizen, Jan. 15, 2010.

When people try to split the difference between two options, they often talk about the "wisdom of Solomon." But they usually forget that the biblical king never actually split anything when deciding the case before him. When Solomon offered to split a baby down the middle to resolve a custody dispute, he knew that the real mother would renounce all claims rather than see the child hurt. He then gave the still-intact child to the woman who was ready to make a sacrifice.

When it comes to deciding where to relocate the Hancher-Voxman-Clapp complex (HVC), University of Iowa officials announced Thursday they actually want to go through with splitting the baby -- separating the H from the VC.

For nearly a year, UI officials have been wavering between what we consider two equally good options for relocating the flood-destroyed complex of buildings:

• Moving the facility just up the hill and out of the floodplain from its present location (which would please Hancher's out-of-area and older patrons who want to avoid getting caught up in downtown traffic and safety issues) or

• Moving the facility closer downtown (which would open up a number of possibilities for downtown and near downtown development).

A few months ago, UI officials threw the community for a loop when they announced a third option: Separating the facilities and relocating the Hancher portion close to its current location while moving the School of Music and its performance space to the downtown site.

We can understand why UI officials like the split-baby option. After all, it addresses the concerns of the many music faculty and students who have felt isolated on the arts campus and who prefer being closer to the heart of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. At the same time, it ensures Hancher Auditorium will be built on land the university already owns -- meaning that reconstruction wouldn't be contingent on the sometimes lengthy process of buying out private landowners.

The split-baby option became feasible only after UI began drawing up plans for what the combined HVC would look like at the downtown site. That's when they found that the facilities -- while part of the same complex -- still would need to be slightly separated. They then asked and received assurance that FEMA would be open to separating the facilities by a longer distance.

Obviously, the benefits of the split baby option have become more and more apparent to UI officials in the past weeks -- especially after one of the downtown property owners indicated he would be reluctant to sell. And if the Iowa state Board of Regents agrees with the UI recommendation and approves the splitting of the H from the VC, then hopefully the university can move forward without needing to threaten or to use eminent domain.

Downtown boosters, understandably, aren't very excited about the option of placing only the School of Music and its recital hall downtown. They've been dreaming a long time about the economic development opportunities that would follow building a more urban university auditorium. That's why, if UI officials are not going to move Hancher downtown, they at least should develop programming at the new Clapp that would help broaden the cultural opportunities in the downtown area -- programming that will help draw in an evening population very different than the current bar-goers.

It'll take a generation, however, to know if UI officials are displaying the wisdom of Solomon with this decision, or if they're merely pleasing no one by trying to please everyone.

Monday, August 9, 2010

- Saturday, October 17, 2009 City: State: Section: OPINION Page: 13 From: Print/Online editions Source: Edition: Publication: Iowa City Press-Citize

Printed in the Iowa City Press-Citizen, Oct. 17, 2009

Our View - Hancher, Voxman, Clapp don't need to stay together

University of Iowa officials threw the community for a loop during Monday's public forum when they announced a third option for relocating the flood-damaged Hancher-Voxman-Clapp (HVC) complex.

For the past two months now, the community has been debating the relative merits and challenges of the two relocation sites that UI officials unveiled in the August public forum:

• Just up the hill -- and out of the river floodplain -- from the location of the complex. (A location, in hindsight, we all wish UI officials, hydrologists and engineers would have suggested building the structure on back in the 1960s.)

• A two-block stretch of land on the south end of the Iowa City downtown. (A location that has city planners and downtown boosters dreaming about the cultural and economic development opportunities.)

Last month we opined that UI officials basically were facing a choice between two equally good options. We urged them to move quickly to choose one and then allow the community to respond. (Many Hancher supporters worry that the longer UI officials wait to make a decision about a new auditorium, the more difficult it becomes for Hancher staff to keep in touch with the patrons and the donors who help keep the vision alive.)

But the third option presented Monday -- separating the facilities by keeping Hancher close to the current complex and relocating Voxman-Clapp near the downtown -- is worthy of more study and scrutiny. The option would address the concerns of the many music faculty and students who have felt isolated on the arts campus and who prefer being closer to the heart of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. And Hancher Auditorium would be built on land the university already owns, so its reconstruction wouldn't be contingent on the sometimes lengthy process of buying out private landowners.

The third option became feasible only recently because FEMA had viewed the HVC complex as a one complex and UI officials had been evaluating sites with that restriction in mind. When UI began drawing up plans for what the combined HVC would look like at the downtown site, they found that the facilities -- while part of the same complex -- still would be slightly separated. They then asked and received assurance that FEMA also would be open to separating the facilities by a longer distance.

UI officials say adding the extra option shouldn't extend the timeline for making a decision -- the pace is being set, in part, by having to gain approval both from the Iowa state Board of Regents and from FEMA. If things continue to fall together, UI officials should have a final decision made by the end of the year.

Downtown boosters aren't as excited about the option of placing only the School of Music and its recital hall downtown. They are still dreaming of the economic development opportunities that would follow building a more urban university auditorium. But building the V and the C would still represent a major investment in the downtown. And the concerts would help broaden the cultural opportunities in the area and hopefully draw in a population very different than the current bar-goers.

The third option just might be the compromise that benefits the most people.